Which AI video generator is right for you? An objective comparison of features, pricing, and use cases.
Best for: Developers, API integration, automation, cost-conscious teams
Best for: Creatives, visual editors, browser-based workflows
| Feature | VAP | Runway |
|---|---|---|
| Video Generation | Yes (Veo 3.1) | Yes (Gen-3) |
| Image Generation | Yes (Flux) | Yes |
| Music Generation | Yes (Suno V5) | No |
| API Access | Full REST API | Limited |
| MCP Integration | Yes | No |
| Browser Editor | Basic Studio | Full Editor |
| Prompt Optimization | Automatic (Claude) | Manual |
| Image-to-Video | No | Yes |
| Video Duration | 4-8 seconds | 5-10 seconds |
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
Yes. VAP requires no migration — simply sign up, deposit credits, and start generating. Your Runway workflows can be replicated via VAP's API or Studio interface.
Both produce high-quality 1080p video. VAP uses Google's Veo 3.1, Runway uses their proprietary Gen-3 Alpha. Quality is comparable; the difference is in workflow and pricing.
For low-to-medium usage, yes. VAP's $1.96/video with no subscription beats Runway's monthly plans if you generate fewer than 20 videos per month. For heavy users, compare total costs.
VAP offers a try-before-deposit Studio experience. Minimum deposit is $5, which covers multiple generations. Failed generations are fully refunded.